The Horizon ethos
Painless publication should follow rigorous research
It is only right that products and therapies are subject to rigorous trials to ensure safety and efficacy, but less benefit is derived from subjecting the publication process to similar such trials and restrictive parameters.
Traditional approach
The good…
Thorough peer review, an experienced editorial board and high quality editorial involvement are vital to the publication of authoritative and insightful papers that add to the body of evidence in a particular disease area.
The bad…
Long publication lead times and high rejection rates are natural consequences of the publishing model that has governed traditional leading journals, but they obstruct the rapid and timely publication of new research data that is vital in fast-moving and dynamic disease areas. The traditional model indiscriminately impedes the publication of both high and poor quality research and obstructs the dissemination of vital information in a society increasingly allied to the sentiments of open access and freedom of information.
Horizon approach
The good…
Not only has the attitude towards a ‘right to publish’ evolved, so has the technology that accompanies publication. Online publication is not restricted by the page limit of print journals, it is fast, accessible and instantly citable, ensuring the crucial information reaches the people who need it, when they need it.
By working with key researchers and opinion leaders, societies and experienced publishers, we ensure the publication of timely, high-quality papers in targeted publications, increasing their exposure and impact for the research community and commercial affiliates alike.